Splicetoday

Politics & Media
Jun 24, 2024, 06:30AM

Hit the Road, Jeff

Public schools need less religious idolatry, not more.

Img 8995.png?ixlib=rails 2.1

It’s not often that I agree with The New York TimesJ6-Obsessive-in-Residence David French but his June 20th column, while a lay-up, was square on the mark. French, like most of the sentient media lambasted Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry—his first year in office—for his wont-survive-legal challenges mandate that the Ten Commandments is posted in every state public school. French does wander off into some jousting of social conservatives, he can’t help himself, but let’s stick to that antiquated badly-framed poster that was a staple of public schools, including my own, decades ago.

French, a devout Evangelical Christian—although his Times beat is mostly confined to tired Trump jeremiads—who “believes in God and the divine inspiration of Scripture, but I do not believe that documents radiate powers of personal virtue.” He adds, sensibly, that while growing up in Kentucky, before religion was wisely taken out of public schools, “My classmates and I were not better people because of the faded posters on the walls.”

I don’t remember whether religious or “patriotic” artifacts were gathering dust at Huntington High School as a teenager in the early-1970s, but they were omnipresent in my grade-school classrooms, displayed prominently to the left of the blackboards, along with a picture of the current U.S. president. My friends and I didn’t think twice about them, or for that matter reciting the “Pledge of Allegiance” every morning, which in retrospect is creepy, although at the time it was a rote part of the day, like saying, “Good morning, Miss Connelly” at homeroom.  And all school assemblies began with singing “The Star-Spangled Banner,” which again didn’t bother me, although I always wondered why you were supposed to put your hand over heart while mouthing the words. I like the song, and the lyrics (the red glare of the rockets and bombs bursting in air is still boss), although you’d think by now that its mandatory kick-off to sporting events would’ve been ditched as jingoistic baggage.

Same as the ubiquitous “In God We Trust” that’s everywhere. This morning I looked at the back of a $20 bill—Andrew Jackson is still on the front, even after the “progressive” promise of Harriet Tubman or Oprah replacing Old H. years ago, which shows just how glacial government action is—and there was “In God We Trust” at the top. Why? Money’s money, and it’s a minor point, but why no stink about that from Democrats, who specialize in minor points? Same with presidential sign-offs of “God bless America,” and court witnesses forced to affirm “So help me, God.”

The phalanx of cultural totems and controversies at public (and some private) schools today is a general, not particular concern, as my kids are well beyond that age. Nevertheless, in an era where children are lucky to emerge from school able to read, and maybe write, aren’t these social symbols—whether it’s religious nonsense, BLM murals, Pride flags and so on—an unnecessary distraction? And spare me Sen. Josh Hawley’s call for the Bible’s return to schools. (I wasn’t subjected to Bible readings as a student, and thank God, since I got my fill at Sunday School and church services.) I’m not advocating bare walls in classrooms, but rather the elimination of stock symbols. Better to have student artwork, good and bad, hanging, and maybe cool movie posters or prints of famous paintings. It’s hard to believe that Picasso’s “Guernica” would cause a stir, or given a teacher’s taste, something from Wayne Thiebaud, Basquiat or Georgia O’Keeffe. Maybe that would spark the imagination of some pupils.

(It goes without saying that the best way to improve conditions in public schools is to smash the teachers’ unions, and hire a Peace Corps-like wave of young men and women just out of college, pay them well, offer tax incentives, whatever it takes. They’d comprise the New Pepsi Generation.)

Back to French. He writes: “Altering constitutional law isn’t the only motivation here: a version of Christian mysticism is also in play. There is a real belief that the Ten Commandments have a form of spiritual power over the hearts and mind of students and that posting the displays can change their lives.” That’s larding it on. I suppose there’s more religious fervor in the Deep South, but if French really believes that Mike Pence-like politicians think the “hearts and minds” of youngsters can be changed by the Ten Commandments, he’s either naïve, or more likely, just baiting cultural conservatives, which is a useless exercise.

—Follow Russ Smith on Twitter: @MUGGER2023

Discussion
  • Spot on. Landry and French made a mountain out of some (ten?) molehills, But I hear my grade school nuns noting that the molehills compose the mountain, they do not comprise it.

    Responses to this comment
  • I am agnostic, don’t respond well to “commandments,” and find more historical truth in Homer than the “Old Testament” of fanciful tales. Nevertheless I don’t have a problem with posting the commandments in schools or other religiously derived materials. There are a couple of reasons for this, for one the presence of some sort of moral superstructure. Even if you think it is all bullshit, there is some utility in having moral precepts guiding people who are credulous and not given over to ruminating over the nature of existence, which is probably most of them. But more importantly (and this is something lost on European secularists), Christianity is intrinsic to Western Civilization and cannot be excised so simply. It is like traveling in France and visiting magnificent, mostly empty cathedrals that so thoroughly dominate the landscape it has no meaning without them. It is inherent in our culture, and even if credibility is lacking that cultural historical foundation is too powerful to dismiss. Furthermore without it what do we have? Basically nothing, for it permeates every national character. Modern European civilization (which includes us, and by which I mean the last 500 or so years) has evolved away from these foundations but they still remain. The only exceptions would be in Greece and southern Italy where there was clearly a prior advanced civilization to fall back upon, which the rest can only reference. Do we really have a problem with most of the moral principles religion promulgates? The same basic notions appear in non-Abrahamic cultures, but illustrate more clearly that the wellsprings of morality emanate from the family, and the universality of these principles. Again, I am not a believer, but I see no harm, and some good coming from people who do believe, and if it works for them why tamper with it?

    Responses to this comment
  • I wouldn't have a problem with putting up the ten commandments in classrooms if I thought the teachers were able to discuss the story of the Exodus and the delivery of the commandments to the Jewish tribes. No need to bring up Christianity or any other religion if teaching the historic significance of law (why not Hammurabi Code is a whole other discussion). That said, I have no trust in our public education system and its current teachers in doing so properly. Conversely, as a former pre-school teacher, I had no problem teaching kids to respect one another and to keep hands to themselves without once referring to scripture so I don't get the argument of why religion, without proper historic context, has to be introduced.

    Responses to this comment
  • George, your comment should have an afterlife in which it becomes an article, in my opinion.

    Responses to this comment
  • George's lengthy comment is already an article, but if he decides to expand on it he might want to focus on the actual issue at hand, a legal one that has nothing at all to do with Europe. No need for more mentions of cathedrals, non-Abrahamic cultures, etc.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment