Splicetoday

Sports
Jun 26, 2008, 05:57AM

No Cinderella In Boston

Everyone thinks the Boston Celtics had a miracle turnaround, but the only thing miraculous about their championship was trading a bunch of eighth graders for All-Stars.

Paulpierce.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

I make a solemn plea to sports analysts everywhere: Please stop referring to the 2007-08 Boston Celtics as the greatest turnaround in NBA history.

Or can we at least put an asterisk next to such a comment?

For those sports fans who were not aware (and I’m looking at you, people living in the Biodome), the Celtics won the 2008 NBA Championship, and in the process they won an impressive 66 games. During the 2006-07 season, however, the Celtics managed only 24 wins—but that’s pretty impressive considering the team consisted of Paul Pierce, some eighth graders and a couple of those old guys whom you see playing at the rec center with Horace Grant-style glasses and braces on both knees. I mean, sure, we all remember the huge splash they made in the free agent market when they signed Kevin Pittsnogle on July 26, but amazingly they turned right around and got rid of him on October 20.

The increase of 42 wins shattered the previous record of 32 games, set by the 1997-98 San Antonio Spurs. Some attribute that amazing feat by the Spurs to the addition of guard Reggie Geary, but I’ve stubbornly held that it had more to do with the drafting of this guy named Tim Duncan (coupled with a healthier David Robinson).

Well, what happened in Boston? Did Brian Scalabrine pull Larry Bird out of his ass? Not that I’m aware of. Did Doc Rivers learn how to coach? Definitely not. The Celtics were poised to get the number one pick in the 2007 NBA Draft and make Greg Oden the “Shaq” to Paul Pierce’s “Kobe.” But at the end of the Draft Lottery, Boston was shocked to find itself with the fifth pick, which was definitely the opposite of “wicked awesome.”  With Pierce growing more and more frustrated with the overall shittiness of the franchise, General Manager Danny Ainge decided it was time to resort to Plan B, entitled: “We Got the Fifth Pick? Holy Shit! What the Fuck Are We Going To Do Now?’  

And so the Celtics executed a number of personnel moves (the most underrated of which was the signing of James Posey). Of course, the primary moves were a trade to acquire Ray Allen from the Seattle Supersonics and a trade to acquire Kevin Garnett from the Minnesota Timberwolves. In fact, out of 15 players on the Celtics 2007-08 roster, only six were on the team during the 2006-07 season. Boston went from a starting lineup of (then-rookie) Rajon Rondo, Wally Szczerbiak, Paul Pierce, Al Jefferson and Kendrick Perkins to a lineup of Rajon Rondo, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett and Kendrick Perkins (not to mention a slew of better bench players). So, really the analysts are right: the Celtics experienced an incredible single season turnaround. Unfortunately, it was a turnaround of their roster.

Does this devalue the Celtics championship? Of course not. My frustration is merely with those people who tend to give credit where credit is not due. To most people, a “dramatic turnaround” is keeping relatively the same roster, drafting one (albeit incredible) player and winning 32 more games—it’s not adding two future Hall-of-Famers, completely changing your bench players and winning 42 more games.

Which brings me to Danny Ainge. We’re quick to forget that he was on the hot seat before this season. I’ll admit, Ainge deserves credit simply for pulling off these trades, but it’s time for everyone else to admit that he fell ass-backwards into this scenario: he is not some sort of GM genius. First of all, he was extremely lucky that there were two teams out there that were in full rebuilding mode and were very eager to unload their respective superstars. People are acting like somehow this was Ainge’s plan all along: stockpile young players and eventually trade them for superstars. In what way is that a reliable strategy? In actuality, Ainge was planning on drafting Greg Oden or Kevin Durant and hoping that either one would form a nice core with Pierce and Al Jefferson. When they wound up with the fifth pick in the Draft, Ainge was forced to say “fuck it” and trade the team away or risk being fired halfway through the season.

This probably makes me seem bitter about the Celtics’ success; however, although I wouldn’t say that I was rooting for them in the Finals, I definitely was not upset about them winning. There are three reasons for this mindset: 1) My hatred of Kobe, Phil Jackson and the Lakers reigns supreme; 2) The result of the Finals made my team, the Cleveland Cavaliers, look pretty damn good considering we almost defeated Boston with nothing more than Lebron James and some cardboard cut-outs of basketball players; and 3) I’m kind of excited (make that downright giddy) about the prospect of the Celtics following the exact same path of the Miami Heat. Much like the Heat, the Celtics mortgaged their future to win a championship right now. There’s nothing wrong with that, but Boston fans need to be prepared for the repercussions. By my math, Ray Allen will be 98 at the start of next season, and he showed significant signs of slowing down throughout the playoffs. Additionally, Kevin Garnett proved to the world that he is content with taking 18-foot jumpers every time down the floor and that he really doesn’t feel compelled to take over a game on most nights, even though he is talented enough to do so.

I congratulate the Boston Celtics on their NBA Championship, but can we please stop talking about this like it’s a rag-tag, Walt Disney, underdog sports tale, reminiscent of Tiny Giants?

Discussion
  • Wah, wah, wah. I'm sick to death of the whole "asterisk" fad that's going around the sports world right now. Medley claims that the Celtics' turnaround wasn't monumental because they got good players? C'mon. That's just smart management. Would the Patriots' undefeated season (if it actually happened) be any less spectacular because they signed Randy Moss? What about the Yankees' history of buying their trophies? The Celtics did what they had to do to win the championship and they did. As Boston fans, we needed that after the horror of the Superbowl. Stop complaining.

    Responses to this comment
  • First of all, the asterisk comment was sarcastic. And I'm not sure how much it is "going around the sports world" since it's only been talked about with Barry Bonds. Secondly, are you seriously comparing the Celtics changing almost their entire roster to the Patriots adding one dynamic player to an already great team? A Patriots team that went 12-4 in the regular season and was 5 points short of going to the Super Bowl? Thirdly, by referencing the Yankees buying of trophies you're missing the point of the article. I'm not saying the Celtics didn't deserve a championship (see, "Does this devalue the Celtics championship? Of course not."); I'm saying that people need to stop talking about their "Miraculous Turnaround" because it isn't a miraculous turnaround at all. The team was shitty, and ownership didn't feel like they would improve, so they changed the team to win a championship. Hell, I wish the Cavs would do the same thing! But if they did, I would hope that sports analysts wouldn't say "What an amazing turnaround these Cavaliers have shown from a year ago!"

    Responses to this comment
  • Right, because in order for a team to "turn around" it needs actually be the same team. And I'm sorry Demian, but to say that Boston "needed" another championship after the "horror" of the Super Bowl is ridiculous. Boston teams have played in THREE CONSECUTIVE TITLE GAMES IN THE THREE MAJOR SPORTS. I understand being disappointed when one of the three teams doesn't pull it off, but Boston doesn't "need" championships more than any other city with a professional sports franchise. I wish all those New Englanders had some more quiet contentment.

    Responses to this comment
  • Thank you, Doing Deities. I forgot to address the point that Demian should ask any fan from the cities of Cleveland or Philadelphia if Boston "needed" a championship.

    Responses to this comment
  • Ha, good piece man, I hate the Celtics and they will fade away just like the Red Sox. I'm calling it!

    Responses to this comment
  • So what if we got a bunch of new, better players, you know what that's called, SMART MANAGEMENT.

    Responses to this comment
  • How will the Celtics or the Red Sox "fade away"? You're talking about two of the oldest franchises in their sports, each commanding gigantic, nationwide fan bases. They may become less competitive in upcoming years, but fading away implies that they'll cease to exist, which is insane.

    Responses to this comment
  • No, that's just called MANAGEMENT. SMART MANAGEMENT is putting pieces together and building a team through drafting and free agency and such (you know, like how the Red Sox signed a little known Minnesota Twins DH named David Ortiz?). SMART MANAGEMENT is not trading your roster for the Western Conference All-Star team. Calling that "smart" is an insult to all the small market teams that win championships.

    Responses to this comment
  • Is basketball the sport where you have first downs? Anyway, to elaborate on the SMART MANAGEMENT claim; it's not. It's short-sighted across the board. They got their trophy; they got their parade where the over-weight players didn't wear their shirts, but they were clearly thinking about this year and this year only. Anyone remember when the Marlins won the World Series? Remember how good they were...that year? Also, being an old franchise with a gigantic fan base doesn't count for anything other than keeping the team around. Look at the Cubs; humongous fan base, but consistently one of the worst teams every year. So, to the sports world, they are FIGURATIVELY fading away.

    Responses to this comment
  • Well, it seems like it worked, Phil.

    Responses to this comment
  • You are correct, Ruffy. But as I have said several times already: my argument is not that somehow the Celtics weren't worthy of the championship or that they didn't earn it - it's simply that they do not deserve the praise of a "dramatic turnaround". The Boston Celtics of 2006-07 were a completely different team than the 2007-08 Celtics.

    Responses to this comment
  • You basketball fans are a different species. I love the Angels. I couldn't care less that the Lakers lost to the Celtics, which makes me a borderline lunatic in Los Angeles.

    Responses to this comment
  • Sourpuss, would you be surprised to find out that I'm actually a bigger baseball fan than basketball fan?

    Responses to this comment
  • Everyone is approaching this from the wrong angle. Yes, it did work. It didn't SEEM to work; it just worked. Proving this; if you want a championship bad enough you can make things happen, i.e. trades, draft picks, etc., buy the best team in the league, and potentially win a trophy. The point is that the media coverage of the entire season is incorrect. This Phil Medley guy is saying that this championship, and season for that matter, shouldn't be looked at as a surprise, cinderalla story, whatever you want to call it. The media was viewing this story with blinders on and saying, "Hey, the Celtics are having a great season. When was the last time they had this great of a season? This would be great if they could keep this up and win a championship." Instead, they should have covered it like this: "Yeah, of course the Celtics are winning. No shit. If they can't win with this team they are just horrible."

    Responses to this comment
  • Couldn't have said it better myself.

    Responses to this comment
  • Mr. Medley, if you're a bigger baseball than basketball fan, why not write something about the MLB season? Like just what the Indians should do at the trading deadline: I think that's a stumper.

    Responses to this comment
  • Since individual team rosters change all the time, I view each team as a continuous organization. I can see Medley's point, but I still view each of the Pats' Superbowls as belonging to the same team, just as I see this year's Celts as the same old green and white as last years. I also consider Bill Russell to be a part of this year's team, because those tear-jerking talks definitely helped KG.

    Responses to this comment

Register or Login to leave a comment